What does everyone think about them? I'm not to sure but might give them a try.

ike and duckett use them, but at $20 theyre kinda steep.  :-/

Yeah that is pricey. Aside from the laser thing they look like well designed lures. But I can whack em on series 3 strike king crank all day and that cost 5 bucks so why bother. They just look cool though. Ike did almost beat skeet last year with one but I think it was his special color he had more than a laser.

Gimmick...

You ever see Ike or Duckett using a "Laser Lure" when it really counts? Or at all for that matter?

Gimmick...

You ever see Ike or Duckett using a "Laser Lure" when it really counts? Or at all for that matter?

Not personally, but I heard from many on the water observers this weekend in Birmingham that Ike was indeed throwing it. 

ike and duckett use them, but at $20 theyre kinda steep. :-/

Yea thats really steep.

Roby

Gimmick...

You ever see Ike or Duckett using a "Laser Lure" when it really counts? Or at all for that matter?

I know for a fact that Ike used the laser lure in the last two Classics.

Ike has a video on his site about Guntersville.  Says he pulled 100lbs on the laser lure in the tourney.

Anyone remember the same type lures that used to be sold on TV informericials? Its funny, but those lures would be laughed at but because Lazer Lure has 2 pro's endorsing them, they sound more legit. Back on topic, any lure will catch fish at any given time but to me, the light is a gimmick.

I've seen these work first hand, I was on a tourney and my co-angler for the day was throwing one. He outfished me every 2 to 1.  >

No Gimmick.

If the flash from a lure triggers strikes then why can't a light in the lure get a couple extra bites. You never know what it might look like to a fish.

I feel like they are good cranks, but the "laser" doesn't help at all. I had 3 and none of them would catch more fish than my other cranks that were less than half of the price.