1 hour ago, GetFishorDieTryin said:

Its hard to interpret what he meant without understanding what his definition of distance would be.  If I hit my target from 50' out it would be considered accurate, but if I hit the target from 15' out it wouldn't be?  

I believe the point is a bit tongue and cheek way to say is there is no accuracy without distance, regardless of its value. So I think you misinterpreted it for the short 15’.  That too would be accurate.  It is an illustration that needs a little thinking outside the box. Weird yet mildly profound. That’s just my take on it and I admit I could have also misinterpreted it but I’m sticking to it, lol  ?

2 hours ago, islandbass said:

So I think you misinterpreted it for the short 15’.  That too would be accurate.

That was my point, whether you hit the target from 10' or 100' you still hit the target.  

5 hours ago, islandbass said:

If I understand this correctly, it Sounds confusing but it’s really not.  Your accurate cast has to go some distance, regardless of its length, lol. 

 

3 hours ago, islandbass said:

I believe the point is a bit tongue and cheek way to say is there is no accuracy without distance, regardless of its value. So I think you misinterpreted it for the short 15’.  That too would be accurate.  It is an illustration that needs a little thinking outside the box. Weird yet mildly profound. That’s just my take on it and I admit I could have also misinterpreted it but I’m sticking to it, lol  ?