Tungsten?
#1
Posted March 31 2012 - 10:03 PM
#2
Posted March 31 2012 - 10:15 PM
#3
Posted March 31 2012 - 10:19 PM
Powell Seaguar
Costa Del Mar Tackle Warehouse
DOWN WITH THE SHIMANO POSSE.
#4
Posted March 31 2012 - 10:26 PM
I like how tungsten is smaller, I can visualize a bass looking more at the craw then the sinker with the smaller tungsten...just seems more subtle
#5
Posted March 31 2012 - 11:16 PM
They're more sensitive because they're more dense, which is why they are smaller as well. The higher density transmits vibrations better, thus why it has more sensitivity than lead, and why tungsten is less likely to deform after it hits a rock, etc.
x 2
#6
Posted April 01 2012 - 08:03 AM
#7
Posted April 01 2012 - 02:37 PM
They're more sensitive because they're more dense, which is why they are smaller as well. The higher density transmits vibrations better, thus why it has more sensitivity than lead, and why tungsten is less likely to deform after it hits a rock, etc.
Right on the money.
Mike D
#8
Posted April 01 2012 - 02:43 PM
#9
Posted April 01 2012 - 07:30 PM
#10
Posted April 01 2012 - 07:51 PM
Yes. cheaper tungsten, or those with inserts, can fray your line. They're not a polished hole and have sharp edges. In general I avoid inserts on the whole, and try only to deal with higher quality weights. The new Strike King tungsten is quite good, The new Bass Pro is good, the best I've found outside of TruTungsten is Picasso. They're now becoming more readily available again, as well. The higher price is worth it in the end.Has anyone ever had trouble with a tungsten weight fraying their line?
#11
Posted April 01 2012 - 07:56 PM
#12
Posted April 01 2012 - 08:07 PM
Powell Seaguar
Costa Del Mar Tackle Warehouse
DOWN WITH THE SHIMANO POSSE.
#13
Posted April 01 2012 - 08:13 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





























