Holy 7 year old thread revival! Nice seeing Bassclary's posts again... that enthusiastic teenager hit the forums like wildfire and it's a bummer he hasn't been around the forums going on nearly 4 years now. Hopefully he's still finding time to fish while in college.

On ‎11‎/‎27‎/‎2010 at 12:25 AM, philsoreel said:

I like everything about Invizx except it's stretch. It's enough to steer me clear of Invizx ever again. I was having some hookset issues earlier this year and narrowed it down to line. I knew I wanted to stick with FC so I checked out Tackletour's FC Line Showdown or whatever it's called.

Sure enough, Invizx was by far the worst in the stretch department and also had the worst amount of deformity.

This isn't all bad. It makes the line very soft for a FC and also allows for the use of a Palomar knot which alot of people will tell you is a no no with FC's.

It's decent but the stretch is just too much for me.

This comment is exactly my findings and thoughts on Invisx as well. 

On 11/27/2010 at 12:25 AM, philsoreel said:

I like everything about Invizx except it's stretch. It's enough to steer me clear of Invizx ever again. I was having some hookset issues earlier this year and narrowed it down to line. I knew I wanted to stick with FC so I checked out Tackletour's FC Line Showdown or whatever it's called.

Sure enough, Invizx was by far the worst in the stretch department and also had the worst amount of deformity.

This isn't all bad. It makes the line very soft for a FC and also allows for the use of a Palomar knot which alot of people will tell you is a no no with FC's.

It's decent but the stretch is just too much for me.

So it’s a perfect crankbait line?