CFDoc

Well that’s....interesting.

Wasn’t sure where to ask this. I have some older posts that no longer have the ‘edit’ option available. I’d like to update some older posts with new information and fix some errors in them. Is this possible?

Did they both start with the same overall diameter? That is to say, is the amount of line in the 70 spool such that the overall diameter the same as the amount of line on the 100 spool? If so then they will be extremely close in ipt. In his case, the spools are identical in width. Only the depth of the sidewall changes.

I wouldn’t worry about it. The math is actually pretty straightforward. The inches in a turn is just pi * diameter * gear ratio. The diameter being the only variable that changes as line gets added/subtracted from the spool. But in your case, I have both USDM and JDM spool Mets. The ipt change is not discernible. The casting capabilities; however, are significantly different.

“Not too bright, this one.” - Archimedes

And then the bait goes in the water.

Where? The JDM zillion is aluminum. The USDM is brass. Regardless, punching requires almost no effort as far as the reel is concerned. I feel hardly any difference punching with a $50 Walmart black max than I do with a Met or zillion.

I mostly use my 6’11” Adrena for jigs, but I’m a skipper. That 7’2”H is a very sensitive rod. Overall sensitivity is very subjective when you get to this stage. I have a megabass X-bites sitting at my local USPS facility. The bad weather down here has delayed delivery 3 days. Once it gets here I will be able to compare several adrenas to it. One thing I will maintain about all my Adrenas is that they are incredibly balanced. Much better balanced than NRX imo. I love to flip and pitch with the adrenas because the balance point is perfect and you barely feel the weight of the rod at all. That 7’2”H is no exception.

Mets have about 10 ponds of drag. Are you pulling more than 10 pounds? If so, it should be turning the spool. If you’re locked down and barely pulling and the spool still turns....you’ve got an issue. FWIW - My Mets have the drag tight year round as well and I haven’t had any issues.

I’m waiting on an Asian portal order right now. They sent me a FedEx tracking number and everything. ?‍♂️

Those Mets belong on the P5’s. That stradic belongs on the Zodias.

Nice. I originally ordered a Tequila Baccarac but it turns out trap tackle was out. So I switched and now have an X Bites on the way instead. Curious to hear your thoughts on them. I still want a TB.

Yes this is an issue for most carbon monocoque handles. I wrap my Adrenas with 0.5mm Lizard Skin wrap. Very thin and comfortable at the same time. I also don’t feel like I’m giving up overall sensitivity too much.

This is exactly what I was hoping to hear. Hoping to get on the water this weekend but the weather is not looking good.

So I ultimately talked to Gary at TTT about it. I searched TT and all I could really find was folks that used them as a frog rod and then sold them, ha. Anyways, after talking to Gary, he assured me that the TB is a particularly special rod with a lot of versatility. It’s this versatility that intrigues me the most. I don’t see myself using this as a swimbait or frog rod. I see it as a rod capable of supporting a wide range of bait weights in applications where sensitivity matters. This is my issue I have with normal dedicated XH type rods. The rods I use for punching 1.5 - 2 oz weights don’t feel right to me if I go to a 0.5 - 0.75 oz bottom contact bait. Even worse if want to tie on a jig and cast it around wood cover or ledge fish. If this rod can truly perform from 0.5 - 4 oz like the blank suggests, I’m going to be extremely impressed. Gary tells me it will so we’ll see.