All this talk of frog leg length got me thinking, if you've ever watched Dean Rojas talk about his signature frog from Spro, he states that he cuts the legs down to make them the proper length. I believe that he or KVD said, "fold the frogs legs over the bait and whatever excess is hanging over the face, cut that off." Well, if Dean Rojas thinks shorter legs are the correct way to go, why doesn't he have them manufacture them that way when he is working with them on his frogs?

 

 

Is anyone going to say, "Well, Dean recommends cutting the legs down on his Spro Dean Rojas Frogs, so I'm going to leave them longer!"?

 

 

 

Ish Monroe has his own signature frog from Snag Proof and he says that the legs are the perfect length. He says, take the frog out of the packaging and immediately start fishing it. Now, that's the way I'd think most people would make their frogs.

 

It's like putting too big of hooks on a Zara Spook and then saying, "If you want to customize them on your own to a smaller size hook, which we recommend, you can."

 

 

 

 

So, why don't frog manufacturers make their frogs with the correct length legs?

Believe it or not, some people like the legs just the way they are. I only starting trimming the legs of my frogs just last year. I have been fishing frogs for alot longer than that. 

Some don't touch them, some cut them even shorter than suggested. Gives people the option to do what they want with them.

Define " correct length ".

You can always cut shorter.

Tom

I find no need to cut them, while I fish other frogs 95% of the time, I have no problem making the Killer Gill SPRO walk right out of the package.

Some don't touch them, some cut them even shorter than suggested. Gives people the option to do what they want with them.

this