While this may be true, the objective of lures is to create a more opportune meal for feeding bass, or an aggressive reaction strike for bass not actively feeding. Ie: All of these lures, that you're apparently against, have a time and place to be used. A time where one is better than another. A place where one is better than another.
I don't have herring lakes where I live, should I fish and pattern to a herring bite because the guys in Kentucky are doing it? Or should I maybe opt for something more similiar to the baitfish actually in my lakes? Perhaps a crawdad? Leech? Imitation panfish?
Well, the Michigan, Indiana, New York, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Florida DNR (or respective agencies) and their state regulatory agencies, disagree with you. As I'm sure many other states do as well. If you see it as an ethical issue, than fine. Advocate away. But you bashing me for advocating for conservation, while being a bed fishing angler, is quite narrow minded.
No one at Berkley, Rapala, Strike King, etc.. are sitting there asking themselves what colors does Largemouth21 want and need? They're more concerned with covering the spectrum for the 60,000,000 US Anglers (generating $115,000,000,000 toward our economy).
If you don't like it, don't buy it. But that 2.5 in Clear Sexy Shad you don't think you need, I do. Or at least the bass like it where I live!
My advice, don't get caught up in the hype if it's not for you. It wasn't created for you. Do your thing and fish to your perceived strengths.