One and done!  ;D 

GO RAVENS!!

Go raven... We took Chef all the way to pre-school.

The Ravens did look quite good today.

One and done! ;D

GO RAVENS!!

Man, the Chiefs didn't even show up! Think they

could use a quarterback?  Geez...

:-X

I would have been happy with 7 wins this year so they did better than I expected for the season. There are a lot of improvements that need to be made. I think the 10 and 6 record obscures the fact that this was the beginning of a rebuild. Because of their very poor record last year they were given a relatively easy schedule and it is reflected in their record. Too bad they didn't make more of a game of it though.

And what's with the Chief's coaching staff? Jamaal Charles will gain a lot of yards and then they will just stop using him like they did today. He was given the ball only twice in the second half and once was on a play that was designed as a deception which fell completely flat. We were playing a better team already, it was going to be our last game of the season if we lose, so why didn't we use our best talent to the fullest?

One and done! ;D

GO RAVENS!!

who do the Raiders play in the play-offs?

Charlie Weis can KMA btw....

9 carrys for Charles, one of the best backs in the NFL right now....

who do the Raiders play in the play-offs?

Nobody. Reason being, the Chefs had the weakest schedule in the NFL. KC was a fluke, everybody could see that. They played what, 2 or 3 teams with decent records this year? Heck, they couldnt help but win the division with a schedule like that.

They played a horrible game. I thought Cassel was gonna play well based on his regular season performance, but I guess not.

I too think they should have gave Charles the ball more. I think he is the best back in the league right now.

There is always next year though.

who do the Raiders play in the play-offs?

Nobody. Reason being, the Chefs had the weakest schedule in the NFL. KC was a fluke, everybody could see that. They played what, 2 or 3 teams with decent records this year? Heck, they couldnt help but win the division with a schedule like that.

the chiefs were a fluke. agreed. charles is not a fluke IMO. the running game is there for the tweeking. why the chiefs stuck with the same old game plan after getting raped by the raiders is a mystery.

next year wont be the same powder puff schedule. i also assume the sparklers to be better.

who do the Raiders play in the play-offs?

Nobody. Reason being, the Chefs had the weakest schedule in the NFL. KC was a fluke, everybody could see that. They played what, 2 or 3 teams with decent records this year? Heck, they couldnt help but win the division with a schedule like that.

Based on 2009 records, the Chief's didn't have the weakest schedule. They couldn't have had the weakest schedule because there were some one, two, and three win teams in 2009 and the Chief's won four games. The Raiders only won five games in '09 so their schedule was pretty easy too. The teams with the worst records have the weakest schedules.

FBL, I agree that the Chiefs winning of the division was a fluke but they are an improved team over the previous year. However, other than Pittsburgh and Miami the Chiefs and Raiders played the same teams. The Chiefs played Cleveland and Buffalo.

The reason the Griefs don't use Charles to full effect is explained by two words - Todd Haley.

They need a better QB, but realistically they are probably stuck with Cassel.  They also need a new head coach.  If KC doesn't improve next year, my guess is Haley will get the axe.