If you’re a biochemist then I assume you’re familiar with the concept of statistical significance. Can you share your experimental process, the numbers you observed, and the level of statistical significance you observed?
I think the vast majority of conclusions that most anglers reach on these matters are the results of misinterpretation of the natural randomness in fishing. I’m not saying some baits don’t work better than others, I’m just saying I’ve rarely seen statistically significant data that supports it.