woolleyfooley

So do you use FC line for any techniques? Or braid on everything? Really curious! So do you use FC line for any techniques? Or braid on everything? Really curious!

Anyone else have any experience with both lines?

Thank you both!

I’m assuming you don’t snell an ewg hook do you? @Mike L I personally use straight shank “flippin” hooks for most of my Texas rigs and anytime I use a straight shank I use a snell knot. Interesting. Are you using a straight shank flippin hook on your punch rigs? @J._Bricker

But it’s so pretty. 😍

@Zcoker Cool! What coast? I’m in south Florida too.

Thanks!

@WRB forgive me, but can you explain what you mean by “reel set”?

Makes sense! Thanks!

You fishing in south Florida? Am I missing something? Am I missing something?

Ok, thank you!

Thanks you @Glenn! Any particular reason to use invizx over tatsu for those applications? Any reason I shouldn’t use tatsu for those applications? Interesting. Thank you for that detailed response! So if I’m reading correctly, are you saying that hard hook sets can break fluorocarbon easier than other lines? I’m thinking about hard hook sets on jigs and flipping hooks.

Quantum also uses Doyo made reels, correct? Not knocking them, just curious!

Thank you both for your responses. I use 25lb tatsu on my flippin/pitchin/t-rig/jig rod. I’ve never worried about throwing it into thick Florida weeds. Do you think I’ve just been lucky? I really don’t like braid for bottom contact baits. I much prefer fluoro. I feel like tatsu is pretty strong. Between invizx and tatsu, which is better for moving baits like spinnerbaits, chatter baits, swim jigs and maybe some small swim baits? I’m curious about the stretch aspect. From what I’ve seen, invizx is one of the worst lines as it pertains to stretch. Multiple tests including This one show it has the most stretch. Unfortunately tatsu isn’t included in that test. With that in mind, how do the 2 lines compare in terms of stretch? Hopefully some members have experience with both. Which would you say has more stretch? Any other opinions from people who have used both would be very appreciated!

Let me get this out of the way, this isn’t a “which is better” thread. I’ve only ever used seaguar tatsu as far as FC goes. I have some invizx that was gifted to me and I’m curious how it compares to tatsu. I use FC for bottom contact baits, weightless senkos and also on my spinnerbait/chatterbait/swim jig setup. All on baitcasters fwiw. Basically, I’d like to know the characteristics of both lines and the differences between the two. Obviously I’d like to hear from people who have used both. Thanks in advance!

How can I tell from that if the clutch bar is metal or not?

Thank you very much for the detailed response! I’ll definitely be looking around to see if I can find comparisons between tatsu and shooter.

Does the steez a2 have the extra BB on the LW and the metal clutch bar as well?

Interesting. I love tatsu, so I’d be curious how close shooter is to tatsu and what the main differences are between the two. Thanks. So what didn’t you like about invizx and what was better about sniper?

Almost seems like the 24 steez sv tw is just a magnesium zillion sv tw. I’m probably wrong though.

Are you saying the sniper is worth a try?

Sweet! Are you in Florida? I’m in swfl.

Great. Thank you so much for your input! Yeah, I love tatsu on my jig/t-rig/flippin/pitchin rig. Just can’t justify the expense on my other setups. Someone on here (apologies, I can’t remember who) said sniper was pretty close to tatsu on performance but obviously much less expensive.

Good to hear. You don’t find the invizx has too much stretch for jigs? I was planning on using 15lb for swim jigs/chatterbaits/spinnerbaits.

One thing I wonder about is the magnesium in brackish water. I don’t fish brackish water purposefully, but living on the gulf in Florida sometimes a pond or canal looks fresh and ends up being salty. Anyone else have opinions on the steez a2 vs the 24 steez sv tw?