3 hours ago, Bankbeater said:

Well they can't get themselves loose from a snag.  

Me and @galyonjgot one loose from a snag……… and watched it sink to the bottom hahahah. Very close to a successful rescue but heartbreaking in clear water 

8 minutes ago, QED said:

Cf. Bell's Theorem. Non-causal vs non-local are both viable options so one doesn't need to conclude FTL action at a distance.

I hope you get entangled with some 13 carrier braid....

9 minutes ago, QED said:

Cf. Bell's Theorem. Non-causal vs non-local are both viable options so one doesn't need to conclude FTL action at a distance.

 

If only we could figure out the gravity of this tangent....

 

 

When using  the 1/4 ounce RES out on the flats for white bass , the  channels . blues and drum will absolutely destroy it . Lift it and let it drop .

On 3/17/2022 at 9:02 PM, TnRiver46 said:

Me and @galyonjgot one loose from a snag……… and watched it sink to the bottom hahahah. Very close to a successful rescue but heartbreaking in clear water 

 

I've lost enough that I'm pretty numb to it now.

On 3/17/2022 at 11:01 AM, Tennessee Boy said:

I wouldn't be too sure.   I can't comment specifically about the capabilities of the RES but I've owned lures with extraordinary knot tying capabilities.  I've seen them tie themselves to things in my boat using knots that no human could ever tie.  The complexity of these knots suggest an understanding of mathematics far beyond calculus.  

 

On 3/17/2022 at 12:43 PM, Chris Catignani said:

Have your read my book?

 Quantum Knot Theory for the Multiverse. An in depth look into quantum suppositions of time.

Explaing how you can place rods all neatly into the rod locker...but when you go to take them out the rods are inter meshed. An in depth look at temporal time and Boltzmann's blurring effect. We see this when me make a hard cast and suddenly a lure is in the tree.

 

On 3/17/2022 at 2:36 PM, QED said:

The multiverse or many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is not the only view.  The less elegant collapse-of-the-wave-function-upon-observation (Copenhagen view) interpretation is still a viable alternative and in either case you might get knots in an unpredictable state - I presume you are attempting to apply physics humor to this thread, but only mathematicians and physicists would get it.

I'm dying ??

31 minutes ago, LrgmouthShad said:

I'm dying ??

Yeah, I knew we were loosing the room, but hey, there is only so far you can get with "GET 'ER DONE!"

I am certain a Red Eye Shad Can't catch a fish in a tree 30 feet above the water, but for some strange reason I have tried.

2 hours ago, LrgmouthShad said:

I'm dying ??

The best line was...

@Deleted account "Putting the spook in spooky action at a distance..."

 

I cant tell you how many spooks I've seen disappear at a distance.

On 3/17/2022 at 11:37 AM, AManWearingAHat said:

If you're me? Catch fish apparently...

Or me. 

 

But I tend to fish a lot of heavily pressured lakes with very little grass (if any), so I think I know why.  

2 minutes ago, Chris Catignani said:

The best line was...

@Deleted account "Putting the spook in spooky action at a distance..."

 

I cant tell you how many spooks I've seen disappear at a distance.

I somehow missed that one. That's great too ?