Skip to content

Is it better to have a better reel or rod?

Featured Replies

 

For me a $200 Tatula SV is a great reel that lasts for a long time. My Tats out lived my lower end rods by years, and are still cooking. My Dobyns Furys, and $100 Fenwicks were sold years ago, kept the reels. Just remember,  You can make a middle of the road rod very sensitive by fishing braided line.

That's my 2 cents

  • Replies 67
  • Views 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Rod but when it come to BFS, I would say the reel.

  • The difference between a $100 reel and a $200 reel is nice but not huge. IE Fuego vs Tat SV.  The difference between a $100 rod and a $200 rod is really a big deal.     

  • bulldog1935
    bulldog1935

    Right reel and Right rod.   Only reel set-up that will fish my salt ML niche properly - I have two rods that fish it with aplomb, one 13Fishing $130, the other JDM Abu $250.  (and another Zillion

Posted Images

  • Super User

I’d rather have a really nice rod and a decent reel than a really nice reel and decent rod. But really nice reels are fun as well. I’m just a gearhead I guess. 

If you’re just getting started. Buy a quality reel. You’ll end up changing out your rods as you develop your fishing style. You have no idea what kind of rod you’ll like the feel of. 

Spend at least $100 on the reel (Daiwa Fuego or Tatula 100) and whatever you have left on the rod. I still use some of my 100's, and I have a stack of zillions and a steez. The zillions are definitely better than the 100's.  By a lot. Still not enough to warrant a rod downgrade. 

But the difference between $50-$99, and $199-$249 on a rod is really big. After about $250 the diminishing returns start to show up.

 

If you gave me $400 for a setup I'd try to find a used fuego or t100 in the forums here, and buy a kistler helium with the rest of it. With $125 for a setup it'd be a used fuego (don't go lower than this if you can help it) and a tatula XT rod on sale, or a daiwa aird-x, which have a lot of reports around here of being workable rods that fish way above the price point. 

 

There's a bit of a minimum spend to get a reel you'll use for years; after that dump it all into the rod.

 

Another option: 

Bass Pro Shops Pro Qualifier Baitcast Combo

Sale

$139.98 $169.98
Save $30.00

 

Good Fishing

Rod. I'd happily put a Black Max (now Max X) on a $300 rod (and have). I wouldn't feel disadvantaged at all. But I would be extremely unhappy with a $200+ reel on, say, an Ugly Stik.

It all depends on your definition of "higher-end". If a Tatula, SLX, or Speed Spool is your definition of high-end, then go with a reel in that class and get a budget rod.

If those reels are your definition of budget, then go with a reel in that class or better, and get a high-end rod.

 

I also agree with the sentiment that moving baits benefit more from a nice reel than they do rod, and bottom contact baits benefit more from a nice rod than they do reel.

  • Super User

Up to a certain point I could say the reel, but once you step up to a basically functional reel, the reel becomes more of a nice to have where the rod upgrades are beneficial.

  • Super User

Rods were invented several thousand years before reels, if that tells you anything.

  • Super User

Imo expensive tackle in hands of a noice is waste of money if you are on a unlimited budget.

Excellent rods available in the $150 to $200 price range and reels in the $175 to $200 price range. Reels are slightly more expense and should outlast the rod technology.

Tom

  • Super User

With all the holiday sales one could put together a quality combo for $200+/-

  • Super User
13 minutes ago, Catt said:

With all the holiday sales one could put together a quality combo for $200+/-

Some time it’s how you buy as much as what you buy.  I still think the rod gets the nod.  

Rod by a good margin imo.  

All good points above!

 

I'll second the notion that if we are talking one "Do-All" rod, then rod over reel. But if I'm buying a setup for bottom contact or moving baits .... Rod is more important for bottom contact and a smooth reel is more important to me for moving baits.

 

I don't want to use a rough grindy reel if I am casting and reeling all day!

Like a couple of guys have already said, "rod for bottom contact and reel for moving baits".

When you die you don't want grandkids and great grandkids sorting through your gear  talking about how grandpa was  a Neanderthal pairing cheap rods/expensive reels or vice versa. Make them both nice 😁

I would say Rod in most instances. However, as @Tennessee Boy eluded to, having the "right" rod vs. having a "nice" rod is key. I have $100ish rods and reels and I have $600+ rods and reels. The "nice" rods and reels are very specific to what they are used for so I feel they are also the "right" rods and reels as well. There is a point of diminishing returns. The key is finding that balance and return on investment for yourself personally. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.